Possibilities of Studying Handwritten Document Requisites Made Using Special Programs and Technical Means
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-4-59-69
Abstract
The article considers possibilities of forensic analysis of copies of handwritten documents made using pseudo-handwritten fonts. The authors offer the definition and classification of such fonts. They also highlight the features characterizing certain ways of forging handwritten requisites of documents with the help of pseudo-handwritten fonts.
The article presents some techniques and methods allowing to establish the facts of performing certain requisites of documents in a non-handwritten way. The authors also describe the mechanism of creating a pseudo-handwritten font based on a specific person’s handwriting, as well as the possibilities of applying graphical editors to create handwritten document requisites impersonating a certain performer using the samples of his handwriting. Based on the example of the software implemented in the robotic arm Dobot Magician, the procedure of creating a text imitating a handwritten one has been studied.
About the Authors
A. F. Kupin
Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation; Bauman Moscow State Technical University (BMSTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Kupin Alexey Fedorovich – Candidate of Law, Associate Professor of the Department of Security in the digital world of the Moscow State Technical University n.a. N.E. Bauman, inspector of the Research Office (Research Institute of Criminalistics) of the Chief Criminalistics Office (Criminalistics Center) of the Investigative Committee of the Russian Federation
105005, Moscow
V. V. Botvina
Bauman Moscow State Technical University (BMSTU)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Botvina Victoria Valeryevna – Candidate of Law, Assistant of the Department of Security in the digital world
105005, Moscow
References
1. Bodrov N.F. Contemporary Possibilities of Recognition of Technically Reproduced Signatures. Actual Problems of Russian Law. 2011. No. 2 (19). Р. 368–379. (In Russ.).
2. Pronin V.N., Lesnikova P.G. Forensic Examination of Signatures to Establish the Fact That They Were Produced by Means of a Plotter (A Case from Forensic Expert’s Practice). Vestnik of Lobachevsky State University of Nizhni Novgorod. 2015. No. 4. P. 162–165. (In Russ.).
3. Shlykov D.A. Possibilities of Examination of Copies of Handwriting Objects. Encyclopedia of Forensic Examination. 2016. No. 3 (10). P. 35–44. (In Russ.).
4. Ushakov D.N. (Ed.). Explanatory Dictionary of the Russian Language. In 3 Volumes. Vol. 3. R–Ya. Moscow: Veche, Mir knigi. 2001. 672 p. (In Russ.).
5. Dal’ V.I. Explanatory Dictionary of the Living Great Russian Language. In 2 Volumes. Vol. 2. P–Ya. Moscow: ROOSSA, 2002. 623. p. (In Russ.).
6. Barinova O.A., Kupin A.F. Fundamentals of Technical and Forensic Examination of Documents: Textbook. Moscow: Bauman Moscow State Technical University, 2022. 187 p. (In Russ.).
7. Dmitriev Е.N., Podkatilina M.L. Forensic Document Examination of Morphology of Strokes of Modern Writing Devices. Moscow: Vildis, 2011. 36 p. (In Russ.).
8. Podvolotsky I.N. Examination and Preliminary Analysis of Documents / A.M. Zinin (ed.). Moscow: Yurlitinform, 2004. 200 p. (In Russ.).
9. Kupin A.F., Titarenko V.A. Signs of the Requisites of Documents Made Using a PseudoHandwritten Font. Issues of Expert Practice. 2019. No. S1. P. 361–366. (In Russ.).
10. Karpukhin A.V. Plinatus A.A., Safonov A.A., Boldyreva E.A. Analysis of Images of Handwriting Objects in Documents Made Using Copying and Multiplying Equipment: Methodological Recommendations. Moscow: EKTs MVD Rossii, 2021. 38 p. (In Russ.).
11. Efremova M.V., Orlova V.F., Starosel’skaya A.D. Conduct of Forensic Handwriting Examination on Electrophotographic Copies: (Informational Letter). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2006. No. 1 (1). P. 157–165. (In Russ.).
12. Barinova O.A., Kupin A.F. Establishing the Fact of Using FONTCREATOR Software When Examining Electrophotographic Document Copies. Forensic Examination. 2018. No. 3 (55). P. 93–101. (In Russ.).
13. Haynes B., Crumpler W., Duggan Sh. Photoshop CS Artistry. Mastering the Digital Image / Translated from English and edited by I.B. Tarabarov. Moscow: Williams, 2005. 552 p. (In Russ.).
14. Levin A.Sh. CorelDRAW: Methods of Working with CorelDRAW, Vector Graphics Tools, Lenses and Special Effects, Creating Inscriptions, Working with Raster Graphics, Making Buttons for Web Pages, Vector Animation in Corel R.A.V.E. Moscow: PITER, 2005. 204 p. (In Russ.).
15. Ismatova T.I. Peculiarities of Diagnostic Examination of Copies of Handwritten Texts Made by Means of Digital Editing. Forensic Examination. 2013. No. 4 (36). P. 90–99. (In Russ.).
16. Cherepenko V.G. Algorithm for the Preliminary Study the Copies of Handwritten Details in Framework the Production of Handwriting Examination. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2020. No. 6 (70). P. 141–148. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2020.70.6.141-148
17. Panova T.O., Milovidova O.U., Karpukhina E.S. Comprehensive Forensic Examination of Handwritten Documents’ Forgery (Expert Practice Case) Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2008. No. 3 (11). Р. 118–121. (In Russ.).
18. Tolkacheva F.K., Karpukhina E.S., Sidelnikova L.V. Comprehensive Analysis of Signatures Created Via Compositing (A Case from Forensic Expert Practice). Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 4 (28). P. 70–73. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Kupin A.F., Botvina V.V. Possibilities of Studying Handwritten Document Requisites Made Using Special Programs and Technical Means. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(4):59-69. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-4-59-69
Views:
994
Email this article 