Tasks of Comprehesvie Forensic Environmental and Construction Examination
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-1-16-26
Abstract
The article presents the main directions of research carried out within the framework of a comprehensive forensic environmental and construction analysis. This kind of examinations can be conducted on criminal, civil and arbitration cases arising from damage to environmental objects caused by illegal actions committed during the erection and operation of constructions.
The authors describe in detail the areas of research which involve specialists in construction and environmental science. To organize multiple studies, the authors provide classifications of solved forensic tasks formed on two grounds: the chronological orientation of examinations and their types. Following the first basis, the authors present retrospective (directed to the past), actualistic (considering the object of expert research in the current time) and prognostic (determining possible changes in the object’s characteristics in the future) tasks. Among the most common tasks for forensic practice, the authors name: existential, identification, diagnostic, situational, regulatory, technical, classification, as well as other tasks that are relevant to an investigated case and determine the effectiveness of the investigation of construction and environmental criminal violations.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Butyrin
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering; The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Butyrin Andrei Yur’evich – Doctor of Law, Professor at the Department of Construction and Property Management; Head of the Laboratory of Construction Forensics
Moscow 129337
Moscow 109028
E. B. Stativa
National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering; The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Stativa Ekaterina Borisovna – Candidate of Law, Associate Professor at the Department of Construction and Property Management; Leading, State Forensic Expert of the Laboratory of Construction Forensics
Moscow 129337
Moscow 109028
N. V. Mikhaleva
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; People’s Friendship University of Russia (RUDN University)
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Mikhaleva Natal’ya Valer’evna – Candidate of Law, Head of the Forensic Research Methodology Department in the System of Forensic Institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice, Head of the Information and Publishing Department; Associate Professor at the Department of Forensic Expert Activities, Law Institute
e-mail: mikhaleva_nata@mail.ru
Moscow 109028
Moscow 117198
References
1. Maiorova E.I. Some Discussion Issues in Environmental Forensics. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2017. Vol. 12. No. 2. P. 112– 118.(In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/18192785-2017-12-2-112-118
2. Rossinskaya E.R., Galyashina E.I., Zinin A.M. The Theory of Forensic Expertise (Forensic Expertology). Textbook / E.R. Rossinskaya (ed.). Moscow: Norma: INFRA-M, 2016. 368 p. (In Russ.).
3. Omel'yanyuk G.G., Mikhaleva N.V. The Forensic Ecological Examination. In: Smirnova S.A. (Ed). Multimodal Edition “Forensic Science. Reboot”. Part 2. Dictionary of Forensic Science. Moscow: Ekom, 2012. P. 411–412. (In Russ.).
4. Rossinskaya E.R. (Ed.). Expertise in Legal Proceedings. Textbook for Bachelors. Moscow: Prospekt, 2020. 336 p. (In Russ.).
5. Voskresenskaya E., Mokhorov D., Tebryaev A. Ecological State of the Urban Environment as an Object of Forensic Analysis within the Period of Introducing the Judicial Reform of Russia. International Science Conference SPbWOSCE-2017 “Business Technologies for Sustainable Urban Development”. 2018. Vol. 170. 01057. https://doi.org/10.1051/matecconf/201817001057
6. Terziev N.V. Identification in Forensic Science. Soviet State and Law. 1948. No. 12. P. 44–45. (In Russ.).
7. Vinberg A.I. Forensic Examination in Soviet Criminal Proceedings. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1956. 220 p. (In Russ.).
8. Koldin V.Ya. Forensic Identification as a Proof of Identity. Issues of Forensic Science. 1962. Issue 6–7 (21–22). P. 25–32. (In Russ.).
9. Koldin V.Ya. Identification in Forensic Examinations. Moscow: Gosyurizdat, 1957. 152 p. (In Russ.).
10. Potapov S.M. Introduction to Forensic Science. Moscow: RIO VYuA KA, 1946. 23 p. (In Russ.).
11. Butyrin A.Yu., Kruglyakova V.M., Shipilova I.A. The Application of Public Data in Forensic Real Estate Valuations: Problems, Limitations, Opportunities. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019. Vol. 14. No. 1. P. 24–29. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-27852019-14-1-24-29
12. Mikhaleva N.V. Using the Special Knowledges for Determining the Extaut of Damage Caused by Environmental Violations. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 1 (25). P. 69–73. (In Russ.).
13. Maiorova E.I. Judicial and Environmental Determination of the Cost of Damage to the Environmental Objects and Their Restoration. Courier of the Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL). 2014. No. 3 (3). P. 61–68. (In Russ.).
14. Mikhaleva N.V., Golubeva S.G. Forensic Practices Related to Environmental Remediation Investigations. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 4. P. 68–75. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-27852018-13-4-68-75
15. Mikhaleva N.V. Forensic Environmental Examinations in Cases on Compensation for Harm (Damage) Caused by Environmental Violations: Analysis of Arbitration Courts’ Practice. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020. Vol. 15. No. 4. P. 47–55. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-4-47-55
16. Krutikova K.V., Morozova E.E. Practice of the Application of the Calculation Method for the Damage to Water Bodies’ Determination in Case of Water Legislation Infringement. Water Sector of Russia: Problems, Technologies, Management. 2018. No. 4. P. 119–129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.35567/1999-4508-2018-4-9
Review
For citations:
Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B., Mikhaleva N.V. Tasks of Comprehesvie Forensic Environmental and Construction Examination. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2022;17(1):16-26. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2022-1-16-26
Views:
990
Email this article 