Forensic Traceological Analysis of Works of Visual Arts
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-106-123
Abstract
The article discusses the fundamentals of traceological forensic analysis of visual artworks within both the framework of forensic traceological examination and comprehensive forensic research with the participation of expert-traceologists. Works of art are investigated to identify them, diagnose their condition, and establish the origin of various negative changes. Forensic traceology methods can play an essential role in the controversial attributions of paintings, drawings, and sculptures. The necessity and feasibility of developing a modern forensic traceological research methodology of fine artworks are substantiated.
About the Author
Sh. N. Khaziev
“Asnis & Partners” Law Office
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Khaziev Shamil Nikolaevich – Doctor of Law, Associate Professor, Attorney at Law
Moscow 121099
References
1. Shevchenko B.I. External Structure As an Individual Property of The Objects of Traceological Identification. Scientific Papers of the USSR Central Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Science. Issue 2. Moscow: TsNIISE, 1970. P. 145–156. (In Russ.)
2. Shevchenko B.I. Scientific Foundations of Modern Traceology. Moscow, 1947. 54 p. (In Russ.)
3. Shevchenko B.I. Forensic Traceological Examination. General Part. Handbook. Issue 1 / Kh.M. Takho-Godi (ed). Moscow: VNIISE, 1972. 74 p. (In Russ.)
4. Granovskii G.L. Methods of Forensic Traceological Examination. Methods of Forensic Expert Research. Collection of Scientific Papers. No. 29. Moscow: VNIISE, 1977. P. 68–112. (In Russ.)
5. Granovskii G.L. The Basics of Traceology. 2nd ed. Moscow: Nauka, 2006. 452 p. (In Russ.)
6. Mailis N.P. Forensic Traceology. Moscow: Pravo i zakon, Ekzamen, 2003. 272 p. (In Russ.)
7. Khaziev Sh.N., Bushin A.V. Application of Trace Evidence Analyses in Fine Art Identification to Rule out Fraudulent Substitution or Damage. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018. Vol. 13. No. 1. P. 60–64. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-201813-1-60-64
8. Khaziev Sh.N. Errors in the Production of Art and Forensic Art Examinations. In: Rossinskaya E.R. (ed). Forensic Examination: Typical Errors. Moscow: Prospekt, 2012. P. 366–371. (In Russ.)
9. Kantor A.M., Arslanov V.G. (eds). Apollo. Fine and Decorative Art. Architecture. Terminological Dictionary. A–Ya. Moscow: Ellis Lak, 1997. 736 p. (In Russ.)
10. Zinin A.M., Roman’ko N.A., Khaziev Sh.N. To the Question on Concept Specification of the Forensic Portrait Expertise Objects. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2012. No. 2 (26). P. 14–19. (In Russ.)
11. Romanko N.A., Zinin A.M., Khaziev Sh.N. Forensic Identification of the Person on the Basis of Appearance and Features of the Structure Body. Russian Journal of Forensic Medicine. 2017. Vol. 3. No. 1. P. 21–25. (In Russ.). http://doi.org/10.19048/2411-8729-2017-3-1-21-25
12. Zinin A.M. Mysteries of Portraits (Forensic Notes). 3 rd ed. Moscow: Prospekt, 2019. 160 p. (In Russ.)
13. Anderson J. The Life of Giovanni Morelli in Risorgimento Italy. Milano: Officina Libraria, 2019. 268 p.
14. Ginzburg C., Davin A., Freud and Sherlock Holmes: Clues and Scientific Method. History Workshop. 1980. No. 9. P. 5–36. https://www.jstor.org/stable/4288283
15. Albertson L. IDs from the Archives in the Michael Steinhardt and Phoenix Ancient Art Seizures. Blogpost of Association for Research into Crime against Art. 15.01.2018. https://art-crime.blogspot.com/search?q=IDs+from+the+Archives+in+the+Michael+Steinhardt+and+Phoenix+Ancient+Art+Seizures
16. Biro P. Fingerprint Examination. Leonardo da Vinci. “La Bella Principessa”. 2009. P. 148–165.
17. Art Experts Claim New da Vinci Found. CBS NEWS. October 14, 2009.
18. Grann D. The Mark of a Masterpiece. The Man Who Keeps Finding Famous Fingerprints on Uncelebrated Works of Art. The New Yorker. July 12, 2010.
19. Koshkin E. Da Vinci’s Fingers Will End Up in a Database. The World’s Great Masters’ Bank of Fingerprints Will Help to Identify a Forgery. Novaya Gazeta. 28.06.2010. No. 68. (In Russ.)
20. Koshkin E.A. Attribution of Paintings by Artists’ Fingerprints (Colonel E. Koshkin’s Method). Petrovka, 38. No. 24 (9429) ot 9.07.2014. (In Russ.)
21. Koshkin E. Attribution of Paintings by Artists’ Fingerprints (Continuation). Evgeny Koshkin’s Author’s Blog. 25.10.2016. http://zavtra.ru/blogs/atributciya_zhivopisnih_poloten-_po_otpechat-kam_pal_tcev_hudozhnikov_(prodolzhenie) (date accessed: 19.02.2020). (In Russ.)
22. Kudryavtseva E. Handicraft. Koshkin Considers the Creation of a Global Database of Artists’ Fingerprints to Be His Life’s Work. Ogonyok. No. 21. 25.05.2008. P. 2. (In Russ.)
23. Greenhalgh Sh. A Forger’s Tale: Confessions of the Bolton Forger. Allen & Unwin, 2017. 438 p.
24. Jones J. This is a Leonardo da Vinci? The Gullible Experts Have Been Duped Again. The Gardian. 30.11.2015. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/nov/30/leonardo-da-vinci-experts-painting-la-bella-principessa
25. Kurin G.I., Chernigovskii V.N. Traceological Examination of Identifying a Whole by Its Parts. Handbook. Volgograd: Volgogradskaya akad. MVD Rossii, 2008. 34 p. (In Russ.)
26. Shevko N.N., Kulenkova E.V. Forensic Investigation of a Whole by Its Parts. Eurasian Scientific Association. 2019. No. 7–3 (53). P. 239–240. (In Russ.)
27. Khaziev Sh.N. Traceological Diagnostics of Left-Handed Actions. Expert Technique. Issue 114. Moscow: VNIISE, 1990. P. 6–12. (In Russ.)
28. Khaziev Sh.N. Showing of Symmetry in Objects of Forensic Traceological Investigation. Expert Practice and New Research Methods. Issue 8. Moscow: VNIISE, 1990. P. 1–6. (In Russ.)
29. Khaziev Sh.N. Traceology and Symmetry. Trace Evidence at Crime Scene. The Second Forensic Experts Conference (January 6–8, 1996). Dubai Police General H.Q. Abstracts. P. 14–16.
30. Wheaton O. Man is Jailed for Punching a Hole Through an £8 Million Monet Painting. Metro. 06.12.2014.
31. Bugaenko .T.F. Technological Features of Modern Painting. Innovations in Science. 2016. No. 55–1. P. 62–66. (In Russ.)
32. Kudryavtsev E.V. Technique of Paintings’ Restoration. Moscow: V. Shevchuk, 2002. 252 p. (In Russ.)
33. Trostyanskaya E.B., Tomashevich G.N., Sorokina E.V. Strengthening and Restoration of Wooden Monuments. Issues of Restoration and Conservation of Works of Fine Art. Handbook. Moscow: Akademiya khudozhestv SSSR, 1960. P. 18–26. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Khaziev Sh.N. Forensic Traceological Analysis of Works of Visual Arts. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2020;15(3):106-123. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2020-3-106-123
Views:
944
Email this article 