Forensic Expert Research as a Type of Cognitive Activity: the Experience of Activity-Based Systems Approach
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-30-34
Abstract
Extended activity systems analysis of the structural organization of forensic inquiry allows to educe its generic system models and to present it as a type of practical cognitive activity. Along this line of reasoning forensic research can be represented as a problem-solving process based on a level principle when an expert cyclically and repeatedly the solution scheme consistently deepens and specifcates the research. The concept of dialogic character shows its inextricable connection with the expert’s method characteristic since the content of the latter determines the corresponding types of expert activity reflected in it. Thus, it can be said that expert’s methods are an ‘action conclusion’ through the defnitions of ‘reasonable practicality’, ‘potentional realizability’ and ‘physical feasibility’ modes.
About the Author
О. A. Krestovnikov
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Russian Federation Ministry of Justice
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Krestovnikov Oleg Anatol’evich – Candidate of Law, Head of the Information and Publishing Department
Moscow 109028
References
1. Yudin E.G. System approach and operational principle. Methodological contemporary science problems. Moscow: Nauka, 1978. 391 p. (In Russ.)
2. Yudin E.G. Activity and consistency. Systems studies. Annual. 1976. Moscow: Nauka, 1977. P. 11–37. (In Russ.)
3. Orlova V.F. The theory of forensic handwriting identification. The works of All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise. Issue 6. Moscow: VNIISE, 1973. 335 p. (In Russ.)
4. Yakovlev Ya.M. Psychological structure of expert activity. The works of All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Forensic Expertise. Issue 7. Issues of forensic science theory and practice. Moscow: VNIISE, 1973. P. 117–138. (In Russ.)
5. Orlov Yu.K. Questions of the logic of expert research. Issue 7. Issues of forensic science theory and practice. Moscow: VNIISE, 1973. P. 139–155. (In Russ.)
6. Belkin R.S. Experiment in investigative, judicial and expert practice. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1964. 223 p. (In Russ.)
7. Ratinov A.R. Forensic psychology for investigators. Study guide. Moscow: VSh MOOP RSFSR, 1967. 290 p. (In Russ.)
8. Vinberg A.I. Forensic expertise in Soviet criminal litigation. Moscow: Yuridicheskaya literatura, 1956. 220 p. (In Russ.)
9. Zinin A.M., Mailis N.P. Forensic Science. Coursebook. Moscow: Yurait: Pravo i zakon, 2002. 318 p. (In Russ.)
10. Olitskii A.A. On the activity approach and its place in the structure of knowledge. Systems studies. Methodological problems. Annual. 1985. Moscow: Nauka, 1986. P. 324–340. (In Russ.)
11. Ladenko I.S., Tul’chinskii G.L. The logic of targeted control. Novosibirsk: Nauka, 1988. 207 p. (In Russ.)
12. Gutchin I.V. Formal neurons in bionics. Moscow: Znanie, 1967. 62 p. (In Russ.)
13. Biryukov B.V., Gutchin I.B. Machine and creation. Results, problems and perspectives. Moscow: Radio i svyaz’, 1982. 152 p. (In Russ.)
14. Arlazarov V.L., Dinits E.A. On the theory of instrumented systems. Systems studies. Methodological problems. Annual. 1983. Moscow: Nauka, 1983. P. 279–292. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Krestovnikov О.A. Forensic Expert Research as a Type of Cognitive Activity: the Experience of Activity-Based Systems Approach. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2019;14(1):30-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-1-30-34
Views:
2106
Email this article 