Special Considerations in Teaching the Academic Discipline «Fundamentals of Forensic Engineering (Construction Forensics)»
https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-3-86-93
Abstract
Based on a detailed analysis of the specifics of teaching the foundations of forensic engineering and construction forensics, as well as distinguishing features of the forensic field itself, the authors identify a number of significant didactic problems and offer solutions. Emphasizing the importance of this type of expertise in modern legal proceedings, a convincing case is made for continuous efforts to improve professional training of the next generation of specialists in the field of construction forensics.
About the Authors
A. Yu. Butyrin
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Andrei Yu. Butyrin – Doctor of Law, Head of the Laboratory of Construction Forensics; Professor at the Department of Construction and Property Management.
Moscow.
E. B. Stativa
The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation; National Research Moscow State University of Civil Engineering.
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Ekaterina B. Stativa – Candidate of Law, Lead State Forensic Examiner of the Laboratory of Construction Forensics; Associate Professor at the Department of Construction and Property Management.
Moscow.
References
1. Butyrin A.Yu., Grabbe T.A., Popova I.I., Khisheva O.I., Kovalenko O.P., Bratskaya I.G., Popov A.N., Shipilova I.A. Assessing technical feasibility and drafting options for residential property division under court-specified conditions: Methodological recommendations for experts. Collected methodological recommendations for construction forensics practitioners. Moscow: RFCFS, 2012. P. 55–96. (In Russ.)
2. Butyrin A.Yu., Grabbe T.A., Sokolov Yu.B., Stativa E.B., Khisheva O.I. Assessing technical feasibility and drafting options for warehouse and office property division under court-specified conditions: Methodological recommendations for experts. Methodological recommendations for valuation and and property division examinations conducted by construction forensics practitioners. Moscow: RFCFS, 2016. P. 265– 331. (In Russ.)
3. Chudievich A.R. Problems of efficiency of normative and technical regulation in building. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2010. No. 1 (17). P. 68–72. (In Russ.)
4. Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B., Chudievich A.R. Forensic engineering and government construction inspection: similarities, differences and grounds for interaction. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2013. No. 2 (30). P. 13–21. (In Russ.)
Review
For citations:
Butyrin A.Yu., Stativa E.B. Special Considerations in Teaching the Academic Discipline «Fundamentals of Forensic Engineering (Construction Forensics)». Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2018;13(3):86-93. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2018-13-3-86-93
Views:
2123
Email this article 