sudexpertТеория и практика судебной экспертизыTheory and Practice of Forensic Science1819-27852587-7275The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science10.30764/1819-2785-2025-1-44-65sudexpert-865Research ArticleСУДЕБНАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА ЗА РУБЕЖОМINTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES IN FORENSIC SCIENCEИспользование искусственных нейронных сетей для решения задач судебно-почерковедческой экспертизы: анализ зарубежного опытаUsing Artificial Neural Networks for Solving Forensic Handwriting Examination Problems: Foreign Experience Analysishttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-1391-4050МищукВ. А.MishchukV. A.

Мищук Всеволод Александрович – аспирант кафедры судебно-экспертной деятельности Юридического института 

Москва 117198

Mishchuk Vsevolod Aleksandrovich – PhD student of the Department of Forensic Science, Institute of Law

Moscow 117198

seva.mi.112@yandex.ruФГАОУ ВО «Российский университет дружбы народов имени Патриса ЛумумбыРоссияPeoples’ Friendship University of Russia named after Patrice LumumbaRussian Federation2025180420252014465Copyright © Мищук В.А., 20252025Мищук В.А.Mishchuk V.A.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/865

В работе исследуется зарубежный опыт применения искусственных нейронных сетей (ИНС) в судебно-почерковедческой экспертизе. На фоне активного внедрения ИНС в различные сферы общественной жизни наблюдается повышенное внимание к теме интеграции этой технологии в судебно-экспертную деятельность. Особенно остро стоит вопрос применения нейросетей в судебно-почерковедческой экспертизе, поскольку, по мнению некоторых ученых и юристов, их использование может значительно повысить объективность почерковедческих исследований.

В статье приведен краткий обзор истории и современных тенденций применения компьютерных технологий в исследовании почерка, рассмотрена связь криминалистики и биометрии в этой области, а также их взаимное влияние, особенно в зарубежной практике экспертизы почерка. Приведены примеры современных успешных проектов и экспериментов, демонстрирующих эффективное использование нейронных сетей для идентификации и верификации человека по его почерку. Обсуждены перспективы развития этого направления и выявлены ключевые проблемы, которые, по мнению автора, в настоящее время препятствуют интеграции нейросетей в судебнопочерковедческую экспертизу.

This paper studies the foreign experience of artificial neural networks (ANN) application in forensic handwriting examination. Given the active ANN implementation in various areas of public life, greater attention is paid to the integration of this technology into forensic activities. According to the opinion of a number of scientists and lawyers the issue of applying neural networks to forensic handwriting examination is particularly acute as they can significantly improve the objectivity of handwriting examinations.

The article gives a brief overview of history and current developments in computer technology use for handwriting examination as well as the connection and mutual influence of forensics and biometrics in this field which is particularly characteristic of foreign practice of forensic handwriting examination. Furthermore, the author presents examples of successful projects and experiments demonstrating effective use of neural networks to identify and verify an individual by his handwriting. The paper also discusses the prospects of this field and identifies the key challenges hindering, in the author’s opinion, the ANN integration in forensic handwriting examination.

биометриязарубежный опытидентификация человека по почеркуискусственные нейронные сетикомпьютерные технологиисудебно-почерковедческая экспертизаbiometricsforeign experiencehandwriting identificationartificial neural networks (ANN)computing technologyforensic handwriting examinationReferencesHicklin R.A., Eisenhart L., Richetelli N., Miller M.D., Belcastro P. et al. Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Handwriting Comparisons // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 119. No. 32. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119944119Hicklin R.A., Eisenhart L., Richetelli N., Miller M.D., Belcastro P. et al. Accuracy and Reliability of Forensic Handwriting Comparisons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022. Vol. 119. No. 32. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2119944119Охлупина А.Н. Проблема однозначности выделения признаков подписей и ее влияние на процесс автоматизации экспертных исследований // Алтайский юридический вестник. 2019. № 1 (25). С. 115–120.Оkhlupina A.N. The Problem of Unambiguous Identification of Signatures and Its Impact on the Automation of Expert Research. Altai Legal Bulletin. 2019. No. 1 (25). P. 115–120. (In Russ.).Scientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination (SWGDOC). https://swgdoc.orgScientific Working Group for Forensic Document Examination (SWGDOC). https://swgdoc.orgTaylor M., Bishop B., Burkes T., Caligiuri M., Found B. et al. Forensic Handwriting Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice Through a Systems Approach // NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR). 2021. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8282r1Taylor M., Bishop B., Burkes T., Caligiuri M., Found B. et al. Forensic Handwriting Examination and Human Factors: Improving the Practice Through a Systems Approach. NIST Interagency/Internal Report (NISTIR). 2021. https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8282r1Best Practice Manual for the Forensic Handwriting Examination. 4th ed. // ENFSI. 2022. https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/BPM-Handwriting-Ed.-4.pdfBest Practice Manual for the Forensic Handwriting Examination. 4th ed. ENFSI. 2022. https://enfsi.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/02/BPM-Handwriting-Ed.-4.pdfГОСТ Р 54412–2019. Информационные технологии. Биометрия. Общие положения и примеры применения. https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293725/4293725565.pdf?ysclid=m82sulc6uq418677385ISO/IEC TR 24741:2018. Information technology – Biometrics – Overview and application, MOD. https://files.stroyinf.ru/Data2/1/4293725/4293725565.pdf?ysclid=m82sulc6uq418677385Кошманов М.П., Кошманов П.М. Этапы и основные направления внедрения компьютерных технологий в судебное почерковедение и почерковедческую экспертизу // Эксперткриминалист. 2008. № 3. С. 35–40.Koshmanov M.P., Koshmanov P.M. Stages and Basic Directions of Computer Technologies Implementation in Forensic Handwriting Examination. Forensic Scientist. 2008. No. 3. P. 35–40. (In Russ.).Минаев Ю., Мамаев В. Итоги и перспективы развития биометрических технологий // Системы безопасности. 01.02.2021. https://www.secuteck.ru/articles/itogi-i-perspektivyrazvitiya-biometricheskih-tekhnologijMinaev Yu., Mamaev V. Results and Prospects of Biometric Technology Development. Security and Safety. 01.02.2021. https://www.secuteck.ru/articles/itogi-i-perspektivyrazvitiya-biometricheskih-tekhnologijFerguson R.W. Presentation to a Workshop on Promoting the Use of Electronic Payments, Held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Chicago, 2000.Ferguson R.W. Presentation to a Workshop on Promoting the Use of Electronic Payments, Held at the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. Chicago, 2000.Potter E.J. Customer Authentication: The Evolution of Signature Verification in Financial Institutions // Journal of Economic Crime Management. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1–19.Potter E.J. Customer Authentication: The Evolution of Signature Verification in Financial Institutions. Journal of Economic Crime Management. 2002. Vol. 1. No. 1. P. 1–19.Dormehl L. Tracing the History and Evolution of the Stylus // Digital Trends. 04.05.2021. https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/evolutionhistory-of-the-stylus/#dt-heading-as-we-may-thinkDormehl L. Tracing the History and Evolution of the Stylus. Digital Trends. 04.05.2021. https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/evolutionhistory-of-the-stylus/#dt-heading-as-we-may-thinkYoshimura M., Kimura F., Yoshimura I. Experimental Comparison of Two Types of Methods of Writer Identification // IEICE Transactions (1976–1990). 1982. Vol. 65. No. 6. P. 345–352.Yoshimura M., Kimura F., Yoshimura I. Experimental Comparison of Two Types of Methods of Writer Identification. IEICE Transactions (1976– 1990). 1982. Vol. 65. No. 6. P. 345–352.Nagel R.N., Rosenfeld A. Computer Detection of Freehand Forgeries // IEEE Transactions on Computers. 1977. Vol. C-26. No. 9. P. 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.1977.1674937Nagel R.N., Rosenfeld A. Computer Detection of Freehand Forgeries. IEEE Transactions on Computers. 1977. Vol. C-26. No. 9. P. 895–905. https://doi.org/10.1109/tc.1977.1674937Plamondon R., Lorette G. Automatic Signature Verification and Writer Identification – the State of the Art // Pattern Recognition. 1989. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(89)90059-9Plamondon R., Lorette G. Automatic Signature Verification and Writer Identification – the State of the Art. Pattern Recognition. 1989. Vol. 22. No. 2. P. 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1016/0031-3203(89)90059-9Leclerc F., Plamondon R. Automatic Signature Verification: The State of the Art – 1989–1993 // International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. 1994. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001494000346Leclerc F., Plamondon R. Automatic Signature Verification: The State of the Art – 1989–1993. International Journal of Pattern Recognition and Artificial Intelligence. 1994. Vol. 8. No. 3. P. 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218001494000346Srihari S., Leedham G. Survey of Computer Methods in Forensic Handwritten Document Examination // Proceedings Eleventh International Graphonomics Society Conference. Sccottsdale, 2003. P. 278–281.Srihari S., Leedham G. Survey of Computer Methods in Forensic Handwritten Document Examination. Proceedings Eleventh International Graphonomics Society Conference. Sccottsdale, 2003. P. 278–281.Sreeraj M., Idicula S.M. A Survey on Writer Identification Schemes // International Journal of Computer Applications. 2011. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 23–33. https://doi.org/10.5120/3075-4205Sreeraj M., Idicula S.M. A Survey on Writer Identification Schemes. International Journal of Computer Applications. 2011. Vol. 26. No. 2. P. 23–33. https://doi.org/10.5120/3075-4205Harralson H.H., Miller L.S. Huber and Headrick’s Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2017. 442 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315152462Harralson H.H., Miller L.S. Huber and Headrick’s Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. 2nd ed. CRC Press, 2017. 442 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315152462Deviterne-Lapeyre M., Ibrahim S. Interpol Questioned Documents Review 2019–2022 // Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2023. Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100300Deviterne-LapeyreM., IbrahimS. Interpol Questioned Documents Review 2019–2022. Forensic Science International: Synergy. 2023. Vol. 6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fsisyn.2022.100300Иванов А.И. Биометрическая идентификация личности по динамике подсознательных движений. Пенза: Изд-во Пенз. гос. ун-та, 2000. 187 с.Ivanov A.I. Biometric Personality Identification Based on Subconscious Movement Dynamics. Penza: Publishing House of Penza State University, 2000. 187 p. (In Russ.).Risinger D.M., Denbeaux M.P., Saks M.J. Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification “Expertise” // The University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1989. Vol. 137. No. 3. P. 731–792. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312276Risinger D.M., Denbeaux M.P., Saks M.J. Exorcism of Ignorance as a Proxy for Rational Knowledge: The Lessons of Handwriting Identification “Expertise”. The University of Pennsylvania Law Review. 1989. Vol. 137. No. 3. P. 731–792. https://doi.org/10.2307/3312276Crawford M.A. Daubert Standard. Walden University, 2014. 8 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2002.2560Crawford M.A. Daubert Standard. Walden University, 2014. 8 p. https://doi.org/10.13140/2.1.2002.2560United States v. Starzecpyzel, 880 F. Supp. 1027. (S.D.N.Y. 1995) // Justia. U.S. Law. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/districtcourts/FSupp/880/1027/1408539United States v. Starzecpyzel, 880 F. Supp. 1027. (S.D.N.Y. 1995) // Justia. U.S. Law. https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/districtcourts/FSupp/880/1027/1408539Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: a Path Forward. The National Academies Press, 2009. 328 p.Strengthening Forensic Science in the United States: a Path Forward. The National Academies Press, 2009. 328 p.Robert E. Pettus, Appellant, v. United States, Appellee // FindLaw. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/dc-court-of-appeals/1593870.htmlRobert E. Pettus, Appellant, v. United States, Appellee // FindLaw. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/dc-court-of-appeals/1593870.htmlKoehler J.J. Intuitive Error Rate Estimates for the Forensic Sciences // Jurimetrics. 2017. Vol. 57. P. 153–168. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817443Koehler J.J. Intuitive Error Rate Estimates for the Forensic Sciences. Jurimetrics. 2017. Vol. 57. P. 153–168. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2817443Report to the President: Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016. 132 p.Report to the President: Forensic Science in Criminal Courts: Ensuring Scientific Validity of Feature-Comparison Methods. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2016. 132 p.Li B., Li N. Handwriting Expertise Reliability: a Review // Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 181–186. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_44_19Li B., Li N. Handwriting Expertise Reliability: a Review. Journal of Forensic Science and Medicine. 2019. Vol. 5. No. 4. P. 181–186. https://doi.org/10.4103/jfsm.jfsm_44_19Kang T.-Y., Kim H., Yook S., Lee J. A Study on Factors that Affect Error Rates in Handwriting Examinations of Korean Characters by Forensic Document Examiners and Non-Experts // Forensic Science International. 2022. Vol. 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111266Kang T.-Y., Kim H., Yook S., Lee J. A Study on Factors that Affect Error Rates in Handwriting Examinations of Korean Characters by Forensic Document Examiners and Non-Experts. Forensic Science International. 2022. Vol. 334. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2022.111266Crot S., Marquis R. A comparative Review of Error Rates in Forensic Handwriting Examination // Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2024. Vol. 69. No. 6. P. 2127–2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15589Crot S., Marquis R. A comparative Review of Error Rates in Forensic Handwriting Examination. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2024. Vol. 69. No. 6. P. 2127–2138. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.15589Huber R.A. Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press, 1999. 456 p.Huber R.A. Handwriting Identification: Facts and Fundamentals. CRC Press, 1999. 456 p.Fairhurst M.C. Signature Verification Revisited: Promoting Practical Exploitation of Biometric Technology // Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal. 1997. Vol. 9. No. 6. P. 273–280.Fairhurst M.C. Signature Verification Revisited: Promoting Practical Exploitation of Biometric Technology. Electronics & Communication Engineering Journal. 1997. Vol. 9. No. 6. P. 273– 280.Kaur R., Rani R., Pahuja R. Text-Dependent and Text-Independent Writer Identification Approaches: Challenges and Future Directions // International Journal of Software Innovation. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 1–23.Kaur R., Rani R., Pahuja R. Text-Dependent and Text-Independent Writer Identification Approaches: Challenges and Future Directions. International Journal of Software Innovation. 2022. Vol. 10. No. 1. P. 1–23.Mitchell T.M. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997. 414 p.Mitchell T.M. Machine Learning. McGraw-Hill, 1997. 414 p.Zhang X.-Y., Xie G.S., Liu Ch.-L., Bengio Y. EndTo-End Online Writer Identification with Recurrent Neural Network // IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems. 2016. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2016.2634921Zhang X.-Y., Xie G.S., Liu Ch.-L., Bengio Y. EndTo-End Online Writer Identification with Recurrent Neural Network. IEEE Transactions on Human-Machine Systems. 2016. Vol. 47. No. 2. P. 285–292. https://doi.org/10.1109/THMS.2016.2634921Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L. et al. Attention is All You Need // Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017. Vol. 30.Vaswani A., Shazeer N., Parmar N., Uszkoreit J., Jones L. et al. Attention is All You Need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017. Vol. 30.Tolosana R., Vera-Rodriguez R., Fierrez J., Ortega-Garcia J. Biometric Signature Verification Using Recurrent Neural Networks // 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). IEEE, 2017. P. 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2017.112Tolosana R., Vera-Rodriguez R., Fierrez J., Ortega-Garcia J. Biometric Signature Verification Using Recurrent Neural Networks. 14th IAPR International Conference on Document Analysis and Recognition (ICDAR). IEEE, 2017. P. 652–657. https://doi.org/10.1109/icdar.2017.112Dhieb T., Njah S., Boubaker H., Ouarda W., Ayed M.B. et al. Towards a Novel Biometric System for Forensic Document Examination // Computers & Security. 2020. Vol. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101973Dhieb T., Njah S., Boubaker H., Ouarda W., Ayed M.B. et al. Towards a Novel Biometric System for Forensic Document Examination. Computers & Security. 2020. Vol. 97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2020.101973Yang W., Jin L., Liu M. DeepWriterID: An End-toEnd Online Text-Independent Writer Identification System // IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2016. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.22Yang W., Jin L., Liu M. DeepWriterID: An Endto-End Online Text-Independent Writer Identification System. IEEE Intelligent Systems. 2016. Vol. 31. No. 2. P. 45–53. https://doi.org/10.1109/MIS.2016.22Chen Z., Yu H.-X., Wu A., Zheng W.-Sh. LetterLevel Online Writer Identification // International Journal of Computer Vision. 2021. Vol. 129. P. 1394–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-020-01414-yChen Z., Yu H.-X., Wu A., Zheng W.-Sh. LetterLevel Online Writer Identification // International Journal of Computer Vision. 2021. Vol. 129. P. 1394–1409. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11263-020-01414-yHameed M.M., Ahmad R., Kiah M.L.M., Murtaza G. Machine Learning-Based Offline Signature Verification Systems: A Systematic Review // Signal Processing: Image Communication. 2021. Vol. 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2021.116139Hameed M.M., Ahmad R., Kiah M.L.M., Murtaza G. Machine Learning-Based Offline Signature Verification Systems: A Systematic Review // Signal Processing: Image Communication. 2021. Vol. 93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.image.2021.116139Khosroshahi S.N.M., Razavi S.N., Sangar A.B., Majidzadeh K. Deep Neural Networks-Based Offline Writer Identification Using Heterogeneous Handwriting Data: an Evaluation via a Novel Standard Dataset // Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 2685–2704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03253-2Khosroshahi S.N.M., Razavi S.N., Sangar A.B., Majidzadeh K. Deep Neural Networks-Based Offline Writer Identification Using Heterogeneous Handwriting Data: an Evaluation via a Novel Standard Dataset. Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing. 2022. Vol. 13. P. 2685–2704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-021-03253-2Nguyen H.T., Nguyen C.T., Ino T., Indurkhya B., Nakagawa M. Text-Independent Writer Identification Using Convolutional Neural Network // Pattern Recognition Letters. 2019. Vol. 121. P. 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.07.022Nguyen H.T., Nguyen C.T., Ino T., Indurkhya B., Nakagawa M. Text-Independent Writer Identification Using Convolutional Neural Network. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2019. Vol. 121. P. 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patrec.2018.07.022Chahi A., El merabet Y., Ruichek Y., Touahni R. WriterINet: a Multi-Path Deep CNN for Offline Text-Independent Writer Identification // International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR). 2023. Vol. 26. P. 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-022-00418-3Chahi A., El merabet Y., Ruichek Y., Touahni R. WriterINet: a Multi-Path Deep CNN for Offline Text-Independent Writer Identification. International Journal on Document Analysis and Recognition (IJDAR). 2023. Vol. 26. P. 89–107. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10032-022-00418-3Kumar P., Sharma A. Segmentation-free Writer Identification Based on Convolutional Neural Network // Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2020. Vol. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106707Kumar P., Sharma A. Segmentation-free Writer Identification Based on Convolutional Neural Network. Computers & Electrical Engineering. 2020. Vol. 85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2020.106707He Sh., Schomaker L. GR-RNN: Global-context Residual Recurrent Neural Networks for Writer Identification // Pattern Recognition. 2021. Vol. 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107975He Sh., Schomaker L. GR-RNN: Global-context Residual Recurrent Neural Networks for Writer Identification. Pattern Recognition. 2021. Vol. 117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.patcog.2021.107975Dey S., Dutta A., Toledo J.I., Ghosh S.K., Llados J. et al. SigNet: Convolutional Siamese Network for Writer Independent Offline Signature Verification // Pattern Recognition Letters. 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.02131Dey S., Dutta A., Toledo J.I., Ghosh S.K., Llados J. et al. SigNet: Convolutional Siamese Network for Writer Independent Offline Signature Verification. Pattern Recognition Letters. 2017. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1707.02131Kumar V., Sundaram S. Siamese Based Neural Network for Offline Writer Identification on Word Level Data // arXiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14443Kumar V., Sundaram S. Siamese Based Neural Network for Offline Writer Identification on Word Level Data. arXiv. 2022. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2211.14443Wang S., Jia S. Signature Handwriting Identification Based on Generative Adversarial Networks // Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1187. No. 4. P. 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1187/4/042047Wang S., Jia S. Signature Handwriting Identification Based on Generative Adversarial Networks. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019. Vol. 1187. No. 4. P. 42–47. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1187/4/042047Kao H.-H., Wen Ch.-Y. An Offline Signature Verification and Forgery Detection Method Based on a Single Known Sample and an Explainable Deep Learning Approach // Applied Sciences. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113716Kao H.-H., Wen Ch.-Y. An Offline Signature Verification and Forgery Detection Method Based on a Single Known Sample and an Explainable Deep Learning Approach. Applied Sciences. 2020. Vol. 10. No. 11. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10113716Simonyan K., Vedaldi A., Zisserman A. Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps // arXiv. 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6034Simonyan K., Vedaldi A., Zisserman A. Deep Inside Convolutional Networks: Visualising Image Classification Models and Saliency Maps. arXiv. 2014. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1312.6034Marcinowski M. Top Interpretable Neural Network for Handwriting Identification // Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2022. Vol. 67. No. 3. P. 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14978Marcinowski M. Top Interpretable Neural Network for Handwriting Identification. Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2022. Vol. 67. No. 3. P. 1140–1148. https://doi.org/10.1111/1556-4029.14978Россинская Е.Р., Бодров Н.Ф. Современное состояние и перспективы исследования образов цифровых следов в судебной почерковедческой экспертизе // Криминалистика: вчера, сегодня, завтра. 2022. Т. 21. № 1. С. 121–135. https://doi.org/10.55001/2587-9820.2022.44.98.011Rossinskaya E.R., Bodrov N.F. The Current State and Prospects for the Study of Digital Trace Images in Forensic Handwriting Expertise. Forensics: Yesterday, Today, Tomorrow. 2022. Vol. 21. No. 1. P. 121–135 (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.55001/2587-9820.2022.44.98.011Журавель А.А., Трошко Н.В., Эджубов Л.Г. Использование алгоритма обобщенного портрета для опознавания образов в судебном почерковедении // Правовая кибернетика. 1970. С. 212–227.Zhuravel A.A., Troshko N.V., Edzhubov L.G. Using Generalized Portrait Algorithm for Pattern Recognition in Forensic Handwriting Examination. Legal Cybernetics. 1970. P. 212–227. (In Russ.).Garrett B.L., Rudin C. Interpretable Algorithmic Forensics // Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023. Vol. 120. No. 41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301842120Garrett B.L., Rudin C. Interpretable Algorithmic Forensics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2023. Vol. 120. No. 41. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2301842120Хазиев Ш.Н., Штохов А.Н. Судебные экспертизы по делам об ошибочной биометрической идентификации // Теория и практика судебной экспертизы. 2024. Т. 19. № 3. С. 88–102. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2024-3-88-102Khaziev Sh.N., Shtokhov A.N. Forensic Examination in Cases of Mistaken Biometric Identification. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2024. Vol. 19. No. 3. P. 88–102. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2024-3-88-102Хазиев Ш.Н. Криминалистические и судебно-экспертные основы современных биометрических технологий // Теория и практика судебной экспертизы. 2023. Т. 18. № 1. С. 16–21. https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-1-16-21Khaziev Sh.N. Forensic Basics of Modern Biometric Technologies. Theory and Practice of Forensic Science. 2023. Vol. 18. No 1. P. 16– 21. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2023-1-16-21

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.