sudexpertТеория и практика судебной экспертизыTheory and Practice of Forensic Science1819-27852587-7275The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science10.30764/1819-2785-2017-12-2-102-118sudexpert-316Research ArticleСУДЕБНАЯ ЭКСПЕРТИЗА ЗА РУБЕЖОМINTERNATIONAL PERSPECTIVES IN FORENSIC SCIENCEИспользование показаний эксперта и результатов оперативно-разыскной деятельности в уголовном процессе в свете решений Европейского суда по правам человекаThe Use of Expert Testimony and Results of Search Operations in the Criminal Process in Keeping with Decisions of the European Court of Human Righthttps://orcid.org/0000-0003-1172-3426НикитинаИ. Э.NikitinaIrina E.

Никитина Ирина Эдуардовна - кандидат юридических наук, заведующая отделом научно-методического обеспечения производства экспертиз в системе СЭУ Минюста России.

Москва. 

Nikitina Irina Eduardovna - Candidate of Law, Head of the Research Methodology Department in the system of State Forensic Institutions of the Russian Ministry of Justice.

Moscow.

onmo@sudexpert.ruФедеральное бюджетное учреждение Российский федеральный центр судебной экспертизы при Министерстве юстиции Российской Федерации.РоссияThe Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science of the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation.Russian Federation201730062017122102111Copyright © Никитина И.Э., 20172017Никитина И.Э.Nikitina I.E.Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/316

The paper examines the problem of using expert testimony and the results of search operations in adversarial courts in keeping with decisions issued by the European Court of Human Rights. It includes a summary of Strasbourg Court rulings concerning search operations and the use of their outcomes. The author lists key requirements imposed by the Strasbourg Court on expert witnesses participating in judicial inquiries.

Европейский суд по правам человекаоперативно-разыскная деятельностьдоказательства в уголовном процессепоказания экспертаправа и свободы человекаEuropean Court of Human Rightssearch operationsevidence in the criminal processexpert testimonyhuman rights and freedomsReferencesКаличенко П.А. Правовое регулирование отношений между Россией и Европейским Союзом. - Автореф. дис. ... д-ра юрид. наук. - М., 2011. - 51 с.Kalichenko P.A. Legal regulation of the relations between Russia and European Union. Abstract of Doctoral thesis (Law). Moscow, 2011. 51 p. (In Russ.).Jakobs L., Sprangers W. A European Viewon Forensic Expertise and Counter-Expertise. In: Nijboer J.F, Sprangers W.J.J.M (eds.) Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An Inquiry into the Desirability of and Opportunities for International Standards. - Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 2000. - P. 213-232.JakobsL., SprangersW. A European Viewon Forensic Expertise and Counter-Expertise. In: Nijboer J.F., Sprangers W.J.J.M (eds.) Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An Inquiry into the Desirability of and Opportunities for International Standards. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 2000. P. 213- 232.Kampen P. Confronting Expert Evidence under the European Convention. In: Nijboer J.F., Sprangers W.J.J.M (eds.) Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An Inquiry into the Desirability of and Opportunities for International Standards. - Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 2000. - P. 183-211.Kampen P. Confronting Expert Evidence under the European Convention. In: Nijboer J.F., Sprangers W.J.J.M (eds.) Harmonisation in Forensic Expertise. An Inquiry into the Desirability of and Opportunities for International Standards. Amsterdam: Thela Thesis, 2000. P. 183- 211.Белкин PC. Курс криминалистики. T. 3: Криминалистические средства, приемы и рекомендации. - М.: Юристъ, 1997. - 538 с.Belkin R.S. Criminalistics course. Vol. 3: Criminalistic methods, receptions and recommendations. Moscow: Yurist”, 1997. 538 p. (In Russ.).ВинбергА.И. Криминалистическая экспертиза в советском уголовном процессе. - М.: Госюриздат, 1956. - 220 с.Vinberg A. I. Criminalistic examination in the Soviet criminal trial. Mosow: Gosyurizdat, 1956. 220 p. (In Russ.).Brants С., Field S. Participation Rights and Proactive Policing. Convergence and Drift in European Criminal Process. Preadvies Nederlandse Vernining voor Rechtsvergelijking. - Deventer: Kluwer, 1995.-51 p.Brants C., Field S. Participation Rights and Proactive Policing. Convergence and Drift in European Criminal Process. Preadvies Nederlandse Vernining voor Rechtsvergelijking. Deventer: Kluwer, 1995. 51 p.Ковлер А.И. «Моральный суверенитет» перед лицом «государственного суверенитета» в европейской системе защиты прав человека» // Международное правосудие. - 2013. - № 3 (7). С. 52-63.Kovler A. Moral Sovereignty in the Face of “State Sovereignty” in the European System of Protection of Human Rights. International Justice. 2013. No3 (7). P. 52- 63. (In Russ.).Shany Yu. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: a Goal-Based Approach // The American Journal of International Law. - 2012. - Vol. 106. No. 2. - P. 225-270. DOI: 10.5305/ amerjintelaw. 106.2.0225Shany Yu. Assessing the Effectiveness of International Courts: a Goal-Based Approach. The American Journal of International Law. 2012. Vol. 106.

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.