<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE article PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Publishing DTD v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-journalpublishing1-3.dtd">
<article article-type="research-article" dtd-version="1.3" xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xml:lang="ru"><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">sudexpert</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title xml:lang="ru">Теория и практика судебной экспертизы</journal-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>Theory and Practice of Forensic Science</trans-title></trans-title-group></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="ppub">1819-2785</issn><issn pub-type="epub">2587-7275</issn><publisher><publisher-name>The Russian Federal Centre of Forensic Science</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id custom-type="elpub" pub-id-type="custom">sudexpert-232</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Research Article</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="ru"><subject>В ПОМОЩЬ СЛЕДОВАТЕЛЮ, СУДЬЕ, АДВОКАТУ</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="section-heading" xml:lang="en"><subject>TIPS FOR INVESTIGATORS/JUDGES/ LAWYERS</subject></subj-group></article-categories><title-group><article-title>АКТУАЛЬНЫЕ ВОПРОСЫ ВЗАИМОДЕЙСТВИЯ ПРАВОПРИМЕНИТЕЛЯ И СУДЕБНОГО ЭКСПЕРТА: ПРОБЛЕМЫ И ПУТИ РЕШЕНИЯ</article-title><trans-title-group xml:lang="en"><trans-title>INTERACTION BETWEEN LEGAL PROFESSIONALS AND FORENSIC EXPERT WITNESSES: PROBLEMS AND SOLUTIONS</trans-title></trans-title-group></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid">https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0063-5706</contrib-id><name-alternatives><name name-style="eastern" xml:lang="ru"><surname>Смирнова</surname><given-names>С. А.</given-names></name><name name-style="western" xml:lang="en"><surname>Smirnova</surname><given-names>S.</given-names></name></name-alternatives><bio xml:lang="ru"><p>директор, доктор юридических наук, профессор, заслуженный юрист Российской Федерации</p></bio><bio xml:lang="en"><p>Director, Professor Distinguished Lawyer of the Russian Federation</p></bio><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff-1"/></contrib></contrib-group><aff-alternatives id="aff-1"><aff xml:lang="ru"><institution>ФБУ РФЦСЭ при Минюсте России</institution><country>Россия</country></aff><aff xml:lang="en"><institution>Russian Federal Center of Forensic Science of the Russian Ministry of Justice&#13;
DSc (Law)</institution><country>Russian Federation</country></aff></aff-alternatives><pub-date pub-type="collection"><year>2014</year></pub-date><pub-date pub-type="epub"><day>30</day><month>09</month><year>2014</year></pub-date><volume>0</volume><issue>3(35)</issue><fpage>44</fpage><lpage>48</lpage><permissions><copyright-statement>Copyright &amp;#x00A9; Смирнова С.А., 2014</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2014</copyright-year><copyright-holder xml:lang="ru">Смирнова С.А.</copyright-holder><copyright-holder xml:lang="en">Smirnova S.</copyright-holder><license xml:lang="ru" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>Данная работа распространяется под лицензией Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.</license-p></license><license xml:lang="en" license-type="creative-commons-attribution" xlink:href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><license-p>This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri xlink:href="https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/232">https://www.tipse.ru/jour/article/view/232</self-uri><abstract><p>На конкретных примерах автор рассматривает проблемы, возникающие привзаимодействии экспертов, экспертного учреждения и судей на этапах подготовки кназначению экспертиз, проведения и рассмотрения дела с участием эксперта в суде;предлагает рекомендации по решению вопросов.</p></abstract><trans-abstract xml:lang="en"><p>The author uses case studies to illustrate various problems of interaction betweenindividual forensic examiners, forensic science organizations and judges at the stagesof preparation for the appointment of forensic examinations, as well as court hearingsand forensic expert witness testimony in court, and recommends possible solutions.</p></trans-abstract><kwd-group xml:lang="ru"><kwd>экспертиза</kwd><kwd>вещественное доказательство</kwd><kwd>немотивированные выводы</kwd><kwd>государственные и негосударственные эксперты</kwd></kwd-group><kwd-group xml:lang="en"><kwd>forensic science</kwd><kwd>evidence</kwd><kwd>unsupported conclusions</kwd><kwd>public and private forensic examiners</kwd></kwd-group></article-meta></front><back><ref-list><title>References</title></ref-list><fn-group><fn fn-type="conflict"><p>The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest present.</p></fn></fn-group></back></article>
